A new vegan cake range from Alternative Foods is launching in UK supermarkets
Another privacy-related fine for Facebook in Europe: The Spanish data protection regulator has issued a EUR1. 2M (~$ 1.4 M) punishment against the social media behemoth for a series of violations seeing its data-harvesting activities.
Spain’s AEPD said an investigation into how Facebook rallies, places and uses data for advertising intents obtained it is doing so without obtaining suitable user consent.
It says it related two serious infringements and one very serious infringement of data protection statute — with the full amounts of the sanction breaking down to EUR3 00,000 for each of the first breaches and EUR6 00,000 for the second.
The regulator witnessed Facebook collects data on ideology, copulation, religious beliefs, personal appetites and sailing — either directly, through users’ employ of its services or from third party pages — without, in this judgment, “clearly informing the user about its implementation and purpose”.
Not procuring express consent of users to manage feelings personal data is classified as a extremely serious offense under local DP law.
Facebook’s use of network browsing cookies was also found in violation of privacy constitutions, with the regulator saying it approved consumers are not informed that their intelligence will be treated through the implementation of its cookies when they are browsing non-Facebook pages that contain Facebook’s’ Like’ button social plug in — noting that while others are for the purposes of this data is declared as being for push, other consume is “secret”, i.e. not disclosed by the company.
“This situation too occurs when consumers are not members of the social network but had already been inspected one of its sheets, as well as when useds who are registered on Facebook browse through third party sheets, even without entering on to Facebook. In these cases, the platform contributes the information collected in said pages to the one associated with your accounting in the social network. Hence, the AEPD considered to be the information provided by Facebook to customers does not comply with data protection regulations, ” it noted.
The regulator is too discontented that Facebook does not delete harvested data once it has finished use it — saying it had been able to verify Facebook does not delete web browsing wonts data, but in fact “retains and reuses it afterward associated with the same user”.
It likewise determined this to be true even when the company had been explicitly requested to delete data by a user.
“Regarding data retention, when a social network used has deleted his account and seeks the deletion of the information, Facebook captivates and treats info for more than 17 months through a deleted accounting cookie. Hence, the AEPD considered to be the personal data of the subscribers are not canceled in full or when they are no longer handy for the following objectives for which they were collected or when the user explicitly requests their removal, according to the requirements of the LOPD[ local data protection principle ], which represents a serious infringement, ” it said.
The AEPR, which mentioned it liaised with other DPAs — in Belgium, France, Germany( Hamburg) and the Netherlands, which too have their own separate investigations into these issues, kick-started following Facebook’s 2015 T& Cs change — said Facebook’s existing privacy plan was guessed to contain “generic and unclear terms”, and to “inaccurately” refer to the use it will realise of the data it collects.
The regulator asserted that a Facebook user “with an average knowledge of the new technologies does not become aware of the collect of data , nor of their storage and subsequent management , nor of what they will be used”.
Commenting on the regulator’s activity, a Facebook spokesperson told us the company intends to appeal the decision, while also noting that its European business is( currently) regulated under Irish data protection rules, where its EU HQ is sited.
RTAG 15 TTIt required the following statement 😛 TAGEND BTAG 1 TT RTAG 16 TTWe take note of the DPA’s decision with which we respectfully differ. Whilst we importance the opportunities we’ve had to engage with the DPA to reinforce how seriously we take the privacy of people who use Facebook, we intend to appeal this decision. As we made clear to the DPA, users choose which info they want to add to their profile and share with others, such as their religion. However, we do not use this information to target adverts to people.
RTAG 17 TTFacebook has long complied with EU data protection law through our constitution in Ireland. We remain open to continuing to discuss these issues with the DPA, whilst we work with our lead regulator the Irish Data Protection Commissioner as we prepare for the EU’s new data protection regulation in 2018.
blockquote > RTAG 18 TTThe size of the AEPR fine is certainly a merely pinprick for Facebook whose 2016 revenue was $27.64 BN. So really its entreaty against the fine is about the company was seeking to bat away any perception that it flouts privacy by refuting ozone-depleting substances of the violations being asserted here.
RTAG 19 TTBut assured through the prism of stricter incoming EU data protection rules, for the purposes of the new GDPR regiman which comes into force next May, there are certainly serious financial considerations for Facebook’s business pertaining to privacy — as the new EU regime includes a far larger stick to beat firms that are guessed to have contravened data protection rules while also tightening up privacy rules by, for example, expanding the definition of personal data and generating EU citizens the right to ask for their data to be deleted.
RTAG 20 TTCompanies will be facing a penalty of up to 4% of their world-wide annual turnover for privacy abuses under GDPR. So, in Facebook’s case, privacy-related punishments could start to proportion to over a billion dollars. And penalties of that sizing aren’t something the tech giant can too often and too easily embroil under its income carpet.
RTAG 21 TTEven as GDPR strengthens the agree the demands for processing personal data, and expands health risks of maintaining and processing lots of personal data.
RTAG 22 TTIn addition, a company like Facebook, which handles data across several EU Member States’ domains, may find the following regulation procreates different situations where it faces more concerted war from other DPAs, i.e. beyond their regional data permission where they’ve installed a European cornerstone. So, in Facebook’s case, it may not so easily be able to claim to be only within the competence of the Irish DPA. And in Europe, it’s bazaar be asserted that some DPAs are decided more pro-privacy than others.
RTAG 23 TTAsked about its GDPR groomings, Facebook previously told us it has designated a cross-functional team to “fully analyze the legislation and help us understand what this would want from a legal, plan and make perspective” — saying this is “the largest cross functional team in the history of the SPTAG 1 TTFacebook family”.
RTAG 24 TTIt is also now looking to recruit a data protection officer — a position mandated under GDPR.
RTAG 25 TT“Ahead of next May we are working with our produce, design and engineering units to improve existing products and build brand-new produces in such a way that simultaneously supplies an intuitive, user-centric know-how and permits us to meet our indebtedness for the purposes of the GDPR, ” supplemented Stephen Deadman, Facebook’s deputy chief global privacy detective, in a statement.
Alternative Foods has announced the launching of a range of vegan cakes made exploiting an innovative egg replacer derived from the naturally occurring protein in aquafaba.
The new straddle, which is available in UK supermarkets now, consists of a savory range of flavors such as Lemon Drizzle, Salted Caramel, Chocolate Fudge, Carrot Cake and Victoria Sponge.
The cakes in the straddle are spawned utilizing “totally natural, totally plant-based and exclusively ethical, ” ingredients, and are also wrap in 100% recyclable packaging made from bottle surpasses to ensure a more ethical and sustained commodity. To escape food waste, excess chickpeas used to realize the egg supplant will be forwarded to an animal shelter to feed the animals.
However, whilst the patties are suitable for vegans, the symbol step up our efforts to grocery the brand as being suitable for everyone.
Speaking to The Grocer, Alternative Foods founder Hannah Carter said: “Unusually, this all-plant array is not going to be targeted at vegans. We are marketing the scope to perfectly everyone, but suitable for vegans.”
Not only is the symbol launching a range of patties, it is also coming set to propelled the aquafaba-based egg replacer used in the reach as a standalone commodity in outpouring 2019 as Carter’s “dream is to see egg replacement used in all residence and commercial-scale baking products .”
The egg replacer, Alternative OGGS, has been developed in collaboration with the School of Food Science& Nutrition at the University of Leeds, and will be marketed as a liquid egg substitute for “all your cooking needs”.
“Dr Joanne Maycock and I have been working with Alternative Foods to develop a vegan egg permutation that can be effectively used in residence baking, ” said Dr Caroline Orfila, activity cause at the School of Food Science& Nutrition.
“Through collaborative investigate, we have helped them to discover a patent-pending process to stabilise plant-based proteins and appoint the optimal formula for a baking ingredient that works every time.”
Alternative Cakes will retail at PS2. 49 for a two-pack of individual patties, PS4. 75 for a four-pack and PS4. 95 for a five-inch cake.
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.